The interwebs are going crazy with Photoshop bashing these days. Everywhere you look, there is a new article or .gif or video about the evils of Photoshop and how it is creating an unattainable and unrealistic standard of beauty that is harming the self worth of women everywhere.
To listen to the all the hype, you'd think that Photoshop was the devil. In fact, it seems like the bandwagon thing to do is hop on the "We hate Photoshop" bus and burn our software in protest.
While I agree that image editing software is being used to create un-realistic images of women, that advertising agencies and the fashion industry in particular are over-using this tool, and that creating an artificial standard of beauty can certainly be an instrument by which someone harms their own self worth; I'm going to be unequivocal and unapologetic about this next statement;
The problem is not with Photoshop. The problem is with human nature.
Let's take a trip down what I'm going to call the Path of Illusions.
What are some things that women in particular use or have used to create the illusion that they are OTHER than what is absolutely natural?
Makeup, corsets, wigs, hair extensions, eyelash extensions (what sadistic bugger came up with THAT one?) hair coloring, plastic surgery-which is a bit more than an illusion I'll grant you- high heels (because you aren't that tall in real life) panty-hose, perfume (do you really smell like jasmine and sandalwood? I didn't think so) the list goes on and on...
Women and men as well (let's not forget powdered wigs and codpieces) have been creating and reaching for unrealistic standards of beauty since time immemorial. Geishas painted their faces, ladies used khol on their eyes, feet were bound, waists cinched to damaging proportions, wigs were festooned with tiny animals and sailing ships, brows were thickened or removed, faces tattooed, and so on and so on, in an effort to appear other than what nature intended.
Every young girl has been exposed to images of beauty that for some reason, whether natural or unnatural, she will not be able to attain. This is nothing new.
This is not to say that we shouldn't bother to change behavior that
has negative consequences just because human nature is flawed. But masking the symptoms doesn't cure the disease. You have to have the right diagnosis.
I think the difference between Photoshop and something like makeup lies in that, with makeup, we can and do create these illusions ourselves. We even out our skin tone with foundations, hide blemishes with concealer, make our eyes look larger with deftly applied shadow, plump up our lips with gloss, and then walk out of the house feeling pretty good about ourselves but knowing what we look like beneath the layers.
When Photoshop gets abused, viewers aren't part of that process. They don't see what the model looks like in the studio beforehand. If the audience watched the magician hide the rabbit in his hat they might still enjoy the trick, but they would never believe in the magic. When we paint our own faces we might enjoy the results but we know what lies beneath.
That is where I believe the danger is. Most of us don't interact with the people we see in magazines or movies, the people who are gifted with great beauty before a team of beauticians and stylists get their hands on them. So, when we see images of them on the screen or the magazine cover, it's natural to assume that what we see is what they are and since we didn't take part in the hoax, we are free to believe the "magic."
What is happening now with the release of before and after Photoshop photos and videos, is a good thing. More and more, the average non-photoshop user is able to see the process, and the image of overly-perfected, unattainable beauty is getting demystified. Hopefully this helps people to see that those images are surreal, that nobody looks like that in real life, and that beating yourself up for not living up to that standard is an act of futility. Just like my mom and dad told me repeatedly while watching movies as a child, it's not real, honey.
Once we begin to see the change, hopefully that will make us more conscious of the ability, and even responsibility, we have as a society to build self-worth rather than destroy it.
I do not believe that Photoshop should stop being used. Getting rid of the photoshop devil is not going to remove the desire for unrealistic beauty. Photoshop didn't create this problem. Advertisers have only used it as a tool to help capitalize on a natural failing in human nature. If we already saw ourselves as beautiful, it would be hard to make money off of our desire to look fabulous, wouldn't it?
There are legitimate reasons to use Photoshop, and I'm going to expound on some of those in my next blog post.
Let me know what YOU think. Leave me a comment. The more dialogue that exists on this issue, the better equipped we are to deal with things like this and the more likelihood that those using image editing software will be held to responsible standards.